Microsoft 5119

I has deploy a test domain with two Domain Controllers because I have exactly the same error on my production environtment. The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. The command failed to complete successfully. After I open a support ticket with Microsoft, they told me that it is normal. I deployed an environment test forest similar to my productive forest and the result are the same.

Don't worry about this result. This It occur also in Windows Server R2. Regards, Paul Andres Pedroza Martinez. Office Office Exchange Server. Not an IT pro? Windows Client. Sign in. United States English. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Asked by:. Archived Forums. Directory Services. Sign in to vote. Wednesday, July 11, AM. Hello, Make sure DC Is not multihomed. Prashant This indicated errors 0xAD are not for the PDC but for terminals trying to connect to this domain controller.

Sign in to your Microsoft account and search on Bing to keep putting points on the board. You can even boost your earning by searching Bing on mobile, on Edge, and in Windows Give with Bing An easy way to support the causes you care about, simply by searching with Bing. Join Microsoft Rewards and start giving with Bing. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days of this comment. Skip to content. Star 4. New issue.

Jump to bottom. Labels area-Dialogs area-Styling needs-author-feedback no-recent-activity team-Controls. Copy link. Search for ContentDialog and click on Show dialog. Instead, they rely on heuristics to determine when to bind data to HTML attributes, event listeners, and JavaScript properties. This has become a large pain-point with FAST's form controls because most of these UI frameworks special-case native form elements so that they work correctly with the framework.

When these frameworks render a custom form element from FAST for which the author is binding a value, the framework does not special-case the 'value' property for the custom element special casing is generally done by tag-name , causing the framework to set the 'value' HTML attribute. As noted above, this effectivly sets the inital value and not necessiarly the stateful value, which can cause the control not to update when authors expect it to.

The pragmatic solution would be for FAST to adjust the component interface to work in a way that better interfaces with these frameworks.

This would greatly reduce developer frustration when using FAST components with these frameworks. Two changes would need to be made:. Implement a 'initial-value' HTML attribute The 'intial-value' HTML attribute would be responsible for what the current 'value' attribute is responsible for and would be behaviorly the same as the existing 'value' attribute, namely configuring the inital value of the control and reacting to form reset callbacks.

This change would additively change the form-associated API which constitutes a minor version itteration. However, it does behaviorally change the components in a way that we might consider a breaking change. Specifically, anyone relying on the 'value' HTML attribute to seed initial value, and the value the control is populated with after form-reset, will see a behavior change. I think this is a minor case but somthing to be aware of. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:.

Sorry, something went wrong. Also, I favor the default-value naming if only for the familiarity it will provide to those coming from React and similar libraries.

Another question, more for chrisdholt : should we bring this up in Open UI? For example, is this a better pattern for the platform to use for new components like selectmenu so that libraries don't have to do more special case logic for new built-ins going forward? I think we certainly can - the key here I think is whether or not the issue lies with the web platform in not having attributes for value , or if the issue is with the frameworks themselves EisenbergEffect nicholasrice I've read through the proposal and it makes sense.

One question that I have is whether or not we need the default-value property at all or if we could live just with just the value property by capturing the value the first time it is set and not updating it afterwards. I believe that would enable things like form reset to work transparently? Or is the reason for using a default value the fact that we can't reliably tell when a value was set for a custom element upon creation. The 'intial-value' HTML attribute would be responsible for what the current 'value' attribute is responsible for and would be behaviorly the same as the existing 'value' attribute, namely configuring the inital value of the control and reacting to form reset callbacks.

Can you clarify how initial-value will get populated? Is it expected to be done by the user, or will it happen automatically? If the user is expected to set it, I fear many simply won't because 1 they're used to using value and 2 when they use value it will still appear to work. Could we have the first set of value set the initial-value if it's not already set?